1992 Project Evaluation Results

---

Prepared by the Policy, Planning and Evaluation Unit (PPEU)

Tables

STRENGTHS/ ACHIEVEMENTS	GAM/86/C02	UGA/85/C03-4	NIC/80/CO3	NIC/84/C01	STP/87/C02	BOT/87/C02
Sound Project Concept	X	X	X	P	X	X
Beneficiaries Well Identified	X	X	X	X	X	X
Proper Identification of Needs	X	X	*	*	P	X
Full Attainment of Objectives	P	*	P	*	P	X
Effective TA	*	*	*	*	P	P
Good Technical Design	X	*	X	*	P	P
Effective Community Participation	P	*	*	*	*	N/A
Sufficient Participation by Women	*	*	*	P	*	N/A
Effective Utilization of Outputs	X	X	X	*	X	X
Effective Maintenance	X	X	X	*	P	X

X: Yes        *: No         P: Partial         N/A: Not applicable

WEAKNESSES/ PROBLEMS	GAM/86/C02	UGA/85/C03-4	NIC/80/CO3	NIC/84/C01	STP/87/C02	BOT/87/C02
Poor Project Formulation/Design	P	P	P	X	P	*
Project Assumptions Not Verified	X	X	X	X	X	*
Poor Technical/ Equipment Specifications	X	X	*	X	P	*
Insufficient Community Sensitisation	*	*	*	X	P	*
High Staff Turnover/Staff Shortage	*	X	*	*	*	*
Lack of Monitoring/Supervision	P	X	P	X	X	*
Insufficient Training	X	X	*	X	X	*
Weak Institutional Capacity	*	P	*	X	*	*
Lack of Project Coordination	X	*	P	X	X	*
Lack of Sectoral Coordination	X	*	X	X	X	*
Under-utilization of Equipment	*	*	*	X	*	*
Procurement/ Recruitment Delays	P	X	X	X	*	X
Time/Cost Over-runs	X	X	X	X	*	X

X: Yes        *: No         P: Partial         N/A: Not applicable