LoCAL applies principles of fiscal decentralization and effective local planning and public financial management to climate change. It combines performance-based grants for climate resilience (PBCRGs), which ensure programming and verification of climate change expenditures at the local level, with technical and capacity-building support.
Performance-based grants for climate resilience provide a financial top-up to cover the additional costs of making investments climate resilient, and are channelled through existing government fiscal transfer systems (rather than parallel or ad hoc structures). International climate finance is channelled through national treasuries — right down to the local level. National ministries are involved in regulating the system.
Once designed, delivering performance-based grants for climate resilience typically involves these key steps:
Capacity-building activities are undertaken at various stages according to identified needs; they target the policy, institutional and individual levels. Often, local governments work with partners that support the capacity building and planning necessary to mainstream adaptation into the decision-making process. These local partners vary by case, but can include other projects and programmes that address adaptation, resilience and environmental issues more broadly. Identifying partners is part of the scoping work in establishing LoCAL in a given country.
LoCAL grants are disbursed as part of a local government’s regular budget envelope and can thus finance the adaptation element of larger investments, allowing for holistic responses to climate change. The funds provide an incentive for local governments to integrate adaptation and climate-proof local development. In addition, by tracking small funds allocated at the local level, LoCAL helps improve transparency.
In any country, LoCAL begins by scoping and designing the performance-based grants for climate resilience system and its key components. This entails defining the financial circuit to channel the funds to the local level and the institutional set-up; defining the size of the grants and the allocation formula; selecting the minimum conditions (including aligning them with existing systems); developing performance measure criteria, with a focus on climate change adaptation and related country priorities; and defining the indicative menu of eligible investments that informs the integration process
Minimum conditions are generally concerned with public financial management and good governance. Performance measures are more qualitative and variable measures of performance; they typically go into more detail within each functional area, such as the quality of the planning or the quality of climate change management, etc. The measures are used to adjust the level of funds made available to local governments when they have complied with the minimum conditions.
The menu of eligible investments defines areas of action that are appropriate for local government intervention. They vary according to climate change impacts, ecosystems, and possible local responses taking into account local constraints such as the financial absorption capacity of the local market. Developing the menu usually involves the use of secondary data and existing vulnerability studies, in addition to primary data collection if necessary. Performance-based grants for climate resilience need to be large enough to have an impact but small enough to be fiscally sustainable and scalable.
Get the latest news, resources and insights delivered directly to your inbox